Understanding Media: The Individual and Society

Deconstruction
March 29, 1996 Brief

Deconstruction as a philosophy, as an architecture, as a design school, calls on us to QUESTION AUTHORITY, blow EVERYTHING A P A R T, tear up the roots, find origins, insult the causes, attack as a wild animal with a mind. Truly how and why have things come to be?


Interview

Deconstruction locates certain crucial oppositions or binary structures of meaning and value that constitute the discourse of 'Western metaphysics'. These include (among many others) the distinctions between form and content, nature and culture, thought and perception, essence and accident, mind and body, theory and practice, male and female, concept and metaphor, speech and writing etc. A Deconstructive reading then goes on to show how these terms are inscribed within a systematic structure of hierarchical privilege, such that one of each pair will always appear to occupy the sovereign or governing position. The aim is then to demonstrate - by way of close reading - how this system is undone, so to speak, from within; how the second or subordinate term in each pair has an equal (maybe a prior) claim to be treated as a condition of possibility for the entire system. Thus writing is regularly marginalised, denounced or put in its place - a strictly secondary, 'supplementary' place - by a long line of thinkers in the Western tradition, from Plato and Aristotle to Rousseau, Husserl, Saussure, Levi-Strauss and the latter-day structuralist sciences of man. But just as often - as Derrida shows in Of Grammatology - writing resurfaces to assert its claim as the repressed other of this whole logocentric tradition, the 'wandering outcast', scapegoat or exile whose off-stage role is a precondition of the system. And this curious 'logic of supplementarity' operates wherever thinking is motivated by a certain constitutive need to exclude or deny that which makes it possible from the outset.

- Chrisopher Norris talking with Jacques Derrida in 1989
From Architectural Design "Deconstruction II", edited by Papadakis 1989

Architecture & Digital Media

The angry deconstructive excavations by the 15th century Italian architects at the foot of the church energized a Renaissance. Beginning with a controversial self-evident right to see and illustrate reality they led the restoration of lost ideas refound in the present - the Roman arch & dome, domestic courtyard. They retreived their past identity. Nietzche warns that history is the process by which the dead bury the living. Nonetheless architects today are encorporating ancient styles, existing remnants of previous buildings and rexploring our building assumptions in a deconstructive fashion. Today's architects like Francis-Ford Bressica define deconstruction with their buildings. Look at them.

Deconstruction is required to invent digital media.