L
A N T E R N Web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0(?).
The browser-oriented Internet evolves from presentation to communications engine.
Web 1.0
1992-2012 ?
• http protocol (W3C)
• html documents (W3C)
• browser (Mozilla, Internet Explorer)
• web server (Apache, IIS)
The web started with models and standards which led to www.w3c.org
Web 2.0 2002-2022?
• java script - client (Google Map API)
• ajax - server to client (Google Maps)
• reformable browser
• XML, XAML
• SOAP
• web services
• rss
• blogs
• mashups
• network collaboration and community-oriented (Napster)
resources: Seth
Godin's Web 2.0 Traffic Watch List, Wiki's
Web 2.0 Web
2 Timeline
http://www.scill.de/content/2006/09/21/web-20-buzz-zeitstrahl/
(Business
Week on Mashups )
Web 3.0 2006-? In formation
• semantic
Web ?
• user agents ?
• data domains ?
• communication topologies
• world language and culture ?
• massblog synthesizers (robot readers)
John Markoff NYT resources: Doug Lenat's Cycorp, KnowItAll (Opine/Google), Metaweb
Loose ideas - Proxy casting to allow remote execution of a transaction between two agents (virus & CPU avoidance mechanisms).
Common vocabularies (anthologies) - metadata maps between vocabularies that allow document creators to know how to mark up their documents so that agents can use the information in the supplied metadata. This also leads to auto-translation systems between world languages.
Opine seems to be a ratings normalize for data miners. Seems to miss the grand ontological definition required by Mr. Computer. Actually a computer/robot requires its own epistemology to classify, name and confirm its own reality. Opine is biased, for humans have found limited descriptions and words to represent parts of reality. Only a computer can appreciate and grade reality by its own words. The interpolation of unfound words was once described as the theory of Zetetics (now obsolete, last reference at the UCDavis library).
Profiles of the Future Chart of the Future